Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering Nehru Institute of Technology
Abstract
Light weight concrete has become more popular in recent years owing to the tremendous advantages it offers over the conventional concrete. Even Light concrete but at the same time strong enough to be used for the structural purpose. Lightweight concrete has been successfully used since the ancient Roman times and it has gained its popularity due to its lower density and superior thermal insulation properties. Compared with Normal weight concrete, Lightweight concrete can significantly reduce the dead load of structural elements, which makes it especially attractive in multi-storey buildings. The most important characteristic of light weight concrete beside its light weight is its low thermal conductivity. This property improves with decreasing density. The adaptation of certain class of light weight concretes gives an outlet for industrial wastes and dismantled wastes which would otherwise create problems for disposal. The conventional mix has been designed for M25 grade concrete. Coarse aggregate replaced with Pumice aggregate in volume percentages of 25% and 33.33% further Cement replaced with the Fly ash in weight percentages of 15%, 20%, 25%, 30% for study in the present investigation. The properties like Compressive strength, Split tensile strength, Flexural strength and Youngs’ modulus of above combinations were studied and compared with conventional design mix concrete. It is observed that there is retardation in Compressive strength, Split tensile strength, Flexural strength and Young’s’ modulus for the light weight aggregate replaced concrete when compared to the concrete made with normal aggregate. For these light weight aggregate concrete mixes when ‘cement’ was replaced by ‘fly ash’ it is noticed that there is a marginal improvement in the properties studied. For 25% replaced light weight aggregate when cement was replaced by 15%, 20%,25% and 30%fly ash, the maximum gain in compressive strength of 18.71% at 28 days is observed for 20% replacement of fly ash. Similarly the gain in split tensile strength, flexural strength and Youngs’ modulus of 16.66%, 29.51% and 10.15% is observed at 20% replacement of fly ash respectively. For 33.33% replaced light weight aggregate when cement was replaced by 15%,20%,25% and 30% fly ash, the maximum gain in compressive strength of 26.3 % is observed for 20% replacement of fly ash. Similarly the gain in split tensile strength, flexural tensile strength and Youngs’ modulus of 19.23%,26% and 3.33% is observed at 20% replacement of fly ash respectively Hence we can infer that 20% replacement of cement by fly ash is optimum proportion among the proportions tested for the properties studied in the present investigation.
Josephine, N. M., V, N., ., S., & Rameshkumar, R. (2021). "A Study on the Mechanical Properties of Light Weight Concrete by Replacing Course Aggregate with (Pumice) and Cement with (Fly Ash)". Int. J. of Aquatic Science, 12(1), 748-757.
MLA
Nitya Mariya Josephine; Nandhini V; Sukumar .; R. Rameshkumar. ""A Study on the Mechanical Properties of Light Weight Concrete by Replacing Course Aggregate with (Pumice) and Cement with (Fly Ash)"". Int. J. of Aquatic Science, 12, 1, 2021, 748-757.
HARVARD
Josephine, N. M., V, N., ., S., Rameshkumar, R. (2021). '"A Study on the Mechanical Properties of Light Weight Concrete by Replacing Course Aggregate with (Pumice) and Cement with (Fly Ash)"', Int. J. of Aquatic Science, 12(1), pp. 748-757.
VANCOUVER
Josephine, N. M., V, N., ., S., Rameshkumar, R. "A Study on the Mechanical Properties of Light Weight Concrete by Replacing Course Aggregate with (Pumice) and Cement with (Fly Ash)". Int. J. of Aquatic Science, 2021; 12(1): 748-757.